From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 6 21:54:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0781A106566B; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:54:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9174F8FC16; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so2272675vws.13 for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:54:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=vaJMiJb8NlEl02PgZpGM/l18jD74LcIlIXEHLdRMcdk=; b=tVangNinWVUgnCOOf/Th7dVv+egs7NkbSI4pGzJwtIHWk7+Uj801uuOW03KJijCdCa S1XZEw2ptdTWCv1Ytfm2Hh/f9NeFOTfQv18CXKN1FVMbrLUhmr9TlntZ0NfY8lhGaofS zOb9rI43//05uP6tUeh43EnD5dltUoDqit+As= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=RjA19cFcCTuWaf+lEUVG27Y5pONfkvkVjtrTL30zEQ4TjlPjEoSk5nkLLxF+Drc06f loQEvMsKb/qvg6Rshwbcj+xN1xRoKe2rqIFS21SXKZo+L+3XlbVz1eqdoS5VAZ0zIpWj 6ato3GJKWJpJnGfBafykgVGXOhqRrADscQpms= Received: by 10.220.125.10 with SMTP id w10mr8310648vcr.102.1265493247418; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:54:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from athena.wi.rr.com ([65.29.54.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 29sm26330520vws.3.2010.02.06.13.54.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:54:06 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:53:57 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.3.4; i386; ; ) References: <1781265383542@webmail54.yandex.ru> <20100206224504.697dc717@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <4B6DE0D6.30502@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <4B6DE0D6.30502@quip.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201002061553.57944.lumiwa@gmail.com> Cc: Ion-Mihai Tetcu , Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Subject: Re: Recent massive port update. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:54:09 -0000 On Saturday 06 February 2010 15:36:22 Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100 > > > > Miroslav Lachman<000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > >> Matthew Seaman wrote: > >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >>> Hash: SHA1 > >>> > >>> On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > >>>> Shouldn't there be an entry in UPDATING, that "jpeg" has to be > >>>> rebuildet first? > >>>> > >>>> I rebuilded everything - but i have no idea about the order aof > >>>> port reinstalling. > >>> > >>> Actually that's not necessary in this case entirely because the > >>> commit was so large. Every port that needs to be rebuilt because > >>> it depends on libjpeg has had it's PORTREVISION bumped. That means > >>> that if you just do a 'portupgrade -a' or 'portmaster -a' the right > >>> thing will happen automatically. > >> > >> No metter if there is revision bump or not, it should be in UPDATING > >> as it was in case of jpeg-7. > >> > >> 20090719: > >> AFFECTS: users of graphics/jpeg > >> AUTHOR: dinoex@FreeBSD.org > >> > >> The IJG jpeg library has been updated to version 7.0. Please > >> rebuild all ports that depend on it. > > > > No need, since it a port has a new version, a rebuild is expected. > > Is expected, but if somebody are not using portmaster or portupgrade, > simple upgrade of jpeg will break other ports and I think that in the > case of jpeg (widely used library) there will be a lot of users asking > "why my app XYZ is not working anymore". > > So what was the reason to put UPDATING entry 20090719 for jpeg 7, if it > is no longer needed for jpeg 8? > > Miroslav Lachman > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > And in my case, I use portmaster, rebuilding of QT33 and arts doesn't work and I screw many applications. Thank you for your hard work but I don't know why is a rush for something which doesn't work? Mitja -------- http://starikarp.redbubble.com