From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 07:00:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B0F16A4BF for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2170443F93 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:00:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.no-ip.com[66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2003091514003401100imju0e>; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:00:34 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.30.200.37] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8FE0XCo078395; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:00:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h8FE0Xin078392; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:00:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: "Michael Vondung" References: <000401c37b74$003e94f0$0200a8c0@tabby> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 15 Sep 2003 10:00:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <000401c37b74$003e94f0$0200a8c0@tabby> Message-ID: <44ekyim9ry.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Partitioning advice (/usr and /home) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:00:36 -0000 "Michael Vondung" writes: > Backup matters aside, is there a significant advantage of having a separate > /home partition at all? If not, just skipping /home and using 70GB for /usr > (including /usr/home) might be the most practical and flexible approach? If it's not a server, then, no, sticking those together in a single partition is probably the most convenient approach. Personally, I wouldn't ignore backup issues -- they are the main impetus behind my own partitioning schemes -- but for a user desktop, other concerns aren't that important.