From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Aug 20  2: 7: 9 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca44-42.ix.netcom.com [209.111.212.170])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF5714FD8
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 02:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id CAA88202; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 02:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: Roger Hardiman <roger@cs.strath.ac.uk>
Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com>, ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: suggestion for new ports section - video
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908181843050.55279-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> <37BD1795.167E@cs.strath.ac.uk>
From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami)
Date: 20 Aug 1999 02:06:34 -0700
In-Reply-To: Roger Hardiman's message of "Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:53:41 +0100"
Message-ID: <vqck8qq2545.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

 * From: Roger Hardiman <roger@cs.strath.ac.uk>

 * Ok. Well as there are only 4 ports at the moment, I'll leave
 * them where they are.

That might be a good idea.  I don't think 4 is too small a number as I
can see this category growing pretty fast, but I'm not sure whether
the line between it and "multimedia" (meaning video and audio) stuff
is clear enough -- if there are more of those kinds, we might want to
think of a different categorization.

-PW


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message