From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 18 18:19:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BC51065677; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:19:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 65-241-43-5.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAA315336C; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DAC8060.2070002@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:18:08 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110319 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek References: <201104172103.p3HL3Ntb049564@svn.freebsd.org> <20110418070124.GA67934@freebsd.org> <8204A257-C8F6-4DCA-99EC-BE48BD9C84E7@bsdimp.com> <20110418181456.GB3097@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20110418181456.GB3097@garage.freebsd.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Roman Divacky , Dimitry Andric , svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, Warner Losh Subject: Re: svn commit: r220755 - in head: . contrib/gcc/doc contrib/gcc/objc contrib/libobjc etc/mtree gnu/lib gnu/lib/libobjc gnu/usr.bin/cc gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1obj gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools gnu/usr.bin/cc/doc s... X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:19:14 -0000 On 04/18/2011 11:14, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:06:42AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> On Apr 18, 2011, at 1:01 AM, Roman Divacky wrote: >> >>> please mark this in src/UPDATING, maybe bump freebsd_version too? >> >> Please do not bump freebsd_version just for this. Ports wishing to know can go off the last bump, if there are any. >> >> Every freebsd_version bump forces rebuilding all modules and such and is a pita. > > I agree that this is a PITA, but there also should be a way to force > module load even on version bump. This is PITA especially for > developers. .... who make up a tiny percentage of the FreeBSD user community. Seriously? We're going to whine because version bumps cause a little extra compile time? -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/