Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:39:35 +0100
From:      Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Idea about 'skeleton jail
Message-ID:  <20050131193935.GA34986@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
In-Reply-To: <51723.81.84.175.77.1107199764.squirrel@81.84.175.77>
References:  <1107178792.613.22.camel@spirit> <20050131161006.GD60177@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <51723.81.84.175.77.1107199764.squirrel@81.84.175.77>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:29:24PM -0600, security@revolutionsp.com wrote:

> Very nice idea!! This greatly improves jail management on FreeBSD. There
> is a possibility for a minor drawback -- if one can change a system binary
> in the host system, them all jails are compromised -- but assuming one
> would need root access on the host to change the binary, he would have
> power to change any jail anyway, so this is rather redundant.
> 
> Great feature here, when can we see this added to the system?

BTW, people are using setups like this for years.

> >> I have already done some experiments.  Basically we want the following
> >> directories to be mount_null'ed:
> >> 	/bin, /sbin, /lib, /libexec, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/include,
> >> 	/usr/lib, /usr/libdata, /usr/libexec, /usr/sbin, /usr/share


-- 
Paweł Małachowski



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050131193935.GA34986>