From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 19:31:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6472B95 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 19:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mario.brtsvcs.net (mario.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:a400::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CD1495B for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 19:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:2580:674:21c:c0ff:fe7f:96ee]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mario.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A86B72C160E; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 19:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:2580:674:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29] (ivy.libssl.so [IPv6:2601:7:2580:674:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4E861724; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 11:31:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <547B7093.1020305@bluerosetech.com> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 11:31:31 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Perry Hutchison Subject: Re: OT: UPS for FreeBSD References: <54777AB1.9010800@bluerosetech.com> <54779629.302@bluerosetech.com> <5478BD4F.7020306@yahoo.com> <5478BEE6.30308@bluerosetech.com> <5478CC08.9090307@yahoo.com> <20141128204722.561f948e@archlinux> <5478F16A.80605@yahoo.com> <54791d3a.w/pI0kak03d+3nKC%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20141129113405.3d1bd1d6@X220.alogt.com> <54798883.saa13h6lE6rPwZCf%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20141129113018.17759e2a@archlinux> <547a52e9.tCBMi6xWobou5Fcd%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <547a52e9.tCBMi6xWobou5Fcd%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 19:31:38 -0000 On 11/29/2014 3:12 PM, Perry Hutchison wrote: > Presuming a reasonable amount of capacitance on the output, > a half wave (single diode) rectifier should produce a DC > output roughly equal to the peak value of the AC input, > which is indeed ~1.4 * the RMS AC voltage. A two-diode > full-wave rectifier using a center tap will also produce DC > of ~1.4 * the RMS voltage of the entire winding (and with > the advantage of less ripple). > > However, a full wave bridge (4 diodes) should produce a DC > output roughly equal to the peak-to-peak value of the AC > input, or ~2.8 * the RMS voltage. An unloaded, ideal, single-phase FWR produces Vdc = 0.900Vrms. The factor is 2sqrt(2)/pi, to be precise. A half-wave rectifier produces half that. From where did you get your figures?