From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 05:50:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07B216A41F for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 05:50:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EC243D45 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 05:50:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7K5oCrH031892 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 05:50:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j7K5oCvi031890; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 05:50:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 05:50:12 GMT Message-Id: <200508200550.j7K5oCvi031890@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: Subject: Re: docs/85128: loader.conf autoboot_delay incompletly described X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Giorgos Keramidas List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 05:50:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/85128; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas To: "Gary W. Swearingen" Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/85128: loader.conf autoboot_delay incompletly described Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 04:28:50 +0300 On 2005-08-19 10:17, "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote: > The description of "autoboot_delay" variable in > /boot/defaults/loader.conf does not mention it's "NO" special > value. > > A variable of the same name is described in loader(8), but it is by no > means obvious whether it's the same variable or just another set at the > loader prompt. > > The variable is only the one in loader.conf that has more than a brief > comment, leading me to wonder if it shouldn't be described in > loader.conf(5) manpage instead, but the first paragraph of its > "Default Settings" section makes me wonder. > > >Fix: > > Decide whether full description belongs in loader(8), loader.conf(5), > or /boot/defaults/loader.conf. I don't know about loader(8), but I'm > thinking a full description should be in loader.conf(5) and referenced > from comment in "/boot/defaults/loader.conf". That seems reasonable. Duplicating the description is not really useful and having the loader options described in loader.conf(5) seems a good thing.