From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Aug 27 22:50: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F5537B406 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 22:50:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f7S5o7850855; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 22:50:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 22:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200108280550.f7S5o7850855@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Pete Fritchman Subject: Re: ports/26092: ksh93 port not installing properly Reply-To: Pete Fritchman Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/26092; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pete Fritchman To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: naddy@mips.inka.de Subject: Re: ports/26092: ksh93 port not installing properly Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 01:45:09 -0400 There's currently some magic to do this in pkg-plist on install, but this will only apply to packages. What would the maintainer think about adding something similiar to the do-install target? (something similiar to what's in ports/shells/zsh/Makefile) -pete -- Pete Fritchman finger petef@databits.net for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message