From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 22 08:23:32 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA04440 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:23:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from qnx.com (qnx.com [198.53.31.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA04435 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 08:23:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nobody@gateway.qnx.com) Received: from gateway.qnx.com (root@gateway.qnx.com [198.53.31.254]) by qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA23442 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:23:16 -0500 Received: (from news@localhost) by gateway.qnx.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA07024 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:10:23 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: gateway.qnx.com: news set sender to using -f From: pixel@DotCom.FR (Emmanuel DELOGET) Subject: Snmp devlpmt Date: 22 Jan 1999 11:10:21 -0500 Organization: QNX Software Systems Ltd. Message-ID: <199901221534.PAA01546@excalibur.oceanis.net> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm sorry to disturb you. I wanna know if a kernel-level SNMP support is planed or not. Since the sysctl stuff provide an interesting beginning, it may be possible to extend its possibilities. I'm currently working on this (a study phase, for the moment). But I have no time to do what allready exists... :) -- pixel@dotcom.fr ---------------------------------------------- DotCom Communication Numérique To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message