Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 09:35:23 -0700 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@freebsd.org> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu> Cc: dhagan@cs.vt.edu, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: elm Message-ID: <20000430093522.B89299@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200004300653.XAA04890@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from asami@cs.berkeley.edu on Sat, Apr 29, 2000 at 11:53:29PM -0700 References: <200004300653.XAA04890@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 29, 2000 at 11:53:29PM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > I was thinking about copying "elm" to "elm+ME" and then committing > elm-2.5.3 on top of "elm", so we will have "elm" as elm-2.5.3 and > "elm+ME" for elm-2.4ME+68. In addition, the package name of elm+ME > should be changed to something like "elm+ME-2.4+68" so users can > choose either from the Latest directory. > > Is that ok for you (both elm maintainers)? It OK from me, although I see absolutely no reason to have elm-2.5.3 -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> http://nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000430093522.B89299>