From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 15 04:10:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id EAA24098 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 04:10:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from deepo.prosa.dk ([193.89.187.27]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id EAA24092; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 04:10:48 -0800 (PST) Received: (from regnauld@localhost) by deepo.prosa.dk (8.8.4/8.8.4/prosa-1.1) id NAA16431; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 13:11:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 13:11:26 +0100 From: regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk (Philippe Regnauld) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: jehamby@freebsd.org Subject: Binary emulations X-Mailer: Mutt 0.55 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2-BETA_A i386 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I know we have at least one Solaris x86 user/developer in here (Jake?) and I'd like to know what kind of hurdles binary solaris-x86 emulation is likely to run into ? I am asking this as I am forced to support Notes internally for users, and I'm wishfully thinking to terminate the NTs here. -- -- Phil -[ Philippe Regnauld / Systems Administrator / regnauld@.prosa.dk ]- -[ Location.: +55.4N +11.3E PGP Key: finger regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk ]-