Date: 24 Feb 1998 09:38:17 -0600 From: Dave Marquardt <marquard@zilker.net> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, peter@clari.net.au Subject: Re: Y2K & tm_struct Message-ID: <85iuq52ety.fsf@localhost.zilker.net> In-Reply-To: peter@clari.net.au's message of "Wed, 25 Feb 1998 00:44:41 %2B1100 (EST)" References: <199802241344.AAA01793@rhiannon.clari.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
peter@clari.net.au writes: > Please email any responses > > As I understand it, tm_year == year-1900 so the year 2000 will be 100. > isn't this going to get rather confusing every time we do a "touch" > or whatever? wouldn't it be better to have a superset-definition such as: > > year-1900 (year<1900) > year (year>1900) > > so that 2000 can be represented either as 2000 or 100 ? Gee, that sounds MORE confusing to me! I guess I don't really understand the problem. -Dave To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?85iuq52ety.fsf>