From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 27 13:46:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD811106566B for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from www.sonnenberger.org (www.ostsee-abc.de [62.206.222.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883888FC1A for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from britannica.bec.de (www.sonnenberger.org [192.168.1.10]) by www.sonnenberger.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4202F6670C for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:46:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6F41B1BDC9E; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:46:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:46:18 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090427134617.GA688@britannica.bec.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <200904270150.31912.pieter@degoeje.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200904270150.31912.pieter@degoeje.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Subject: Re: ACPI-fast default timecounter, but HPET 83% faster X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:46:31 -0000 On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:50:31AM +0200, Pieter de Goeje wrote: > While fiddling with the sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware, I found out > that on my system HPET is significantly faster than ACPI-fast. I did some extensive testing on a variety of AMD and Intel boards and never found a system where HPET is slower than ACPI-fast. In addition, HPET provides a higher resolution. Joerg