Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 17:54:41 +0100 From: void <void@f-m.fm> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qt6 the default qt on -current? Message-ID: <ZNPE0ckqXQadgICJ@int21h> In-Reply-To: <cyzw-46if-wny@FreeBSD.org> References: <ZNNeomqHmVNxId9X@int21h> <cyzw-46if-wny@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 04:47:36PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: >Please, use ports@ list next time. Every supported FreeBSD version uses >the same ports/ tree. Not supported FreeBSD versions require a time >machine i.e., rolling back the ports/ tree to a date before EOL. OK. I didn't think the query belonged in ports@ for the following reasons: 1. the question wasn't about a port problem or a PR 2. development happens on -current primarily 3. the system it concerns is running -current >When everything in ports supports Qt6. Once Plasma6 arrives Qt5 may >start to dilapidate and be eventually removed, similar to Qt4. ok, thanks --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZNPE0ckqXQadgICJ>