From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct  1 13:26:36 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: gnome@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E991065672;
	Sat,  1 Oct 2011 13:26:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from crees@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE64D8FC0C;
	Sat,  1 Oct 2011 13:26:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p91DQaTf031384;
	Sat, 1 Oct 2011 13:26:36 GMT
	(envelope-from crees@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from crees@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p91DQadN031380;
	Sat, 1 Oct 2011 13:26:36 GMT (envelope-from crees)
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 13:26:36 GMT
Message-Id: <201110011326.p91DQadN031380@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: andy.lavr@gmail.com, crees@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org
From: crees@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/161202: [ERROR] cannot portupgrade ports/x11-toolkits/gdl
	with CLANG
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
	<freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:26:37 -0000

Synopsis: [ERROR] cannot portupgrade ports/x11-toolkits/gdl with CLANG

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: crees
State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 1 13:26:36 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why: 
I have explained several times now that there is no point in reporting
ports that fail to build with clang. It is not expected that every port
support clang yet, so breakage will occur.  The list of
broken-with-clang ports is at
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
(some have been fixed). Please stop reporting breakage with clang unless
you have a fix.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161202