From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Feb 2 12:50:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA12410 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 12:50:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA12402 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 12:50:41 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id VAA02138 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 21:50:39 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.5/8.6.9) id VAA08569; Sun, 2 Feb 1997 21:44:55 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 21:44:54 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting CD-ROM when data not on first track References: <199702022002.NAA08336@phaeton.artisoft.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.55-PL10 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199702022002.NAA08336@phaeton.artisoft.com>; from Terry Lambert on Feb 2, 1997 13:02:42 -0700 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Terry Lambert wrote: > > > But it's not a data area... or rather, it's not a 'data' area. > > > > Doesn't matter. > It matters, in that this disc is not mountable by FreeBSD. But that's not due to the fact that FreeBSD doesn't start to remap the block/frame numbers, but due to the fact that FreeBSD's cd9660 filesystem stuff doesn't care for the TOC at all. Don't try to `fix' something by uglifying it. > blame FreeBSD, not the disc... Nobody has ever claimed that FreeBSD would DTRT. > FreeBSD is interpreting audio data as 'data'. No, it isn't interpreting it at all. It doesn't care for the d*mn TOC yet. > > Why do you call this `stupid'? That's the same way every Unix does. > > It's only that they probably miss the mount philosophy, so they could > > have locked the medium until it will no longer be required for paging. > > Uh, "sticky bit"... I can solve the problem in UNIX. Sticky bit? Terry, you're riding your time-machine again, you're currently some ten years back. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)