From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Mar 27 14:41:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (rwcrmhc54.attbi.com [216.148.227.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CCC37B7DB; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 14:40:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020327224010.ZWG1214.rwcrmhc54.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 22:40:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA49064; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 14:35:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 14:34:59 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Jake Burkholder Cc: John Baldwin , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP safe reference counting In-Reply-To: <20020327171351.E31836@locore.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Jake Burkholder wrote: > Apparently, On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 04:51:57PM -0500, > > We support 386 still? > We certainly support it but I think that for 386 we can ignore the concept of SMP and make versions that are not SMP safe but DO satisfy the basic functionality.. i.e. the '386 version of atomic ops need not be atomic :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message