From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 3 11:57:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B15106564A for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 11:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD388FC16 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 11:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwp14 with SMTP id 14so1777469wwp.31 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 04:57:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.229.165 with SMTP id h37mr6164614weq.45.1320321460874; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 04:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l20sm9758331wbo.6.2011.11.03.04.57.39 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Nov 2011 04:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EB281B2.7020204@my.gd> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 12:57:38 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4EB247E7.1010708@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4EB2662A.2010609@my.gd> <4EB26E7D.3020105@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4EB26E7D.3020105@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: DNS config help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:57:42 -0000 On 11/3/11 11:35 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 03/11/2011 10:00, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> Actually, using a view that matches only the VPN's IP range would do the >> trick easily and efficiently. > > Views are a way of giving a different answer depending on who is asking > the question -- how does that help the OP when he's always querying from > within his 10.0.0.0/8 network? He's the client connecting to the VPN here. > I didn't understand his problem like that, my bad. I remember hearing at work that dnsmasq could do that, perhaps with a little bit of scripting.