From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 18 20:45:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6A41065672 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:45:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7078FC18 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [85.173.16.144] (helo=izar) by services.ipt.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Mzccc-000DZS-Nc; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:44:58 +0400 To: Juergen Lock References: <20091017154404.GA80599@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <99413628@ipt.ru> <20091018174157.GB99191@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <99401887@ipt.ru> <20091018202545.GA53402@triton8.kn-bremen.de> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:47:19 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20091018202545.GA53402@triton8.kn-bremen.de> (Juergen Lock's message of "Sun\, 18 Oct 2009 22\:25\:45 +0200") Message-ID: <33329848@ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: how to test for linux base version? (googleearth) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:45:00 -0000 Juergen Lock writes: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:13:20AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> Juergen Lock writes: >> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 02:30:43PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> >> Juergen Lock writes: >> >> >> >> > I just got reminded to add a linux base version check to astro/google-earth >> >> > (It now needs recent linux libstdc++.so.6 with GLIBCXX_3.4.9 that only >> >> > is in f9 or f10, you can do >> >> >> >> First of, I'd recommend leaving f9 alone (I'm going to deprecate all >> >> linux base ports except fc4 and f10 soon). >> >> >> > Ah Ok. (Does f10 work well enough on 7.x yet?) >> >> Well, there is no choice anyway. We do have fc4 and f10 infractructure >> ports. I think it's wise to use apropriate base ports. I don't think >> there is any difference between f9 and f10 linux base ports. >> > Oh I was more thinking of f8 since we have nonbase ports for that too... Hm, but it were you who said that only f9 and f10 base ports had libstdc++.so.6 with apropriate symbols. ;-) About f8 ports. Almost all current linux ports play well with f10 ports at 7.2, 8.0 and 9-CURRENT. Only one exception I'm aware is acroread9 (a linux syscall should be implemented). If those ports (f8) are usefull for 7.0 and 7.1 (6.x doesn't have apropriate kernel sources) then they should stay until 7.0 and 7.1 are EOLed. -- WBR, bsam