From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 12:15:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 5265B61A; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:15:14 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Andrey Chernov Subject: Re: svn commit: r307612 - in head/misc/astrolog: . files Message-ID: <20121121121514.GA95229@FreeBSD.org> References: <201211210949.qAL9nl4a018306@svn.freebsd.org> <50ACB0A7.1030108@freebsd.org> <50ACBE7D.70203@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50ACBE7D.70203@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Chris Rees , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:15:14 -0000 On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 03:43:57PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > Yes, but the new naming convention is something which should be decided > by portmgr@ to keep all things in line. F.e. will it be '-' or '_' or > '=' or some combination of them etc? It is unknown to me at this moment, > so I prefer to stay the old one I see. It should be known to you for quite some time now. Perhaps it makes sense if you reread this relevant section of our PH: http://freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/slow-patch.html ./danfe