From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 15 22:58:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F65D16A4CE for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:58:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1562143D54 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:58:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 15038 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2005 22:58:58 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Mar 2005 22:58:58 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 82D2882; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:58:57 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20050315172854.GG91771@hub.freebsd.org> <44psy04ppa.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050315205119.GR91771@hub.freebsd.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 15 Mar 2005 17:58:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20050315205119.GR91771@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <44wts8zfbi.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 32 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Max recursion level (500) exceeded. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:58:59 -0000 Kris Kennaway writes: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 03:30:25PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Kris Kennaway writes: > > > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:51:36PM +0430, Lee Harr wrote: > > > > I am getting this error when cleaning in ports directories > > > > (it seems perhaps only on ports involving python): > > > > > > > > make: Max recursion level (500) exceeded.: Resource temporarily unavailable > > > > > > > > > > > > It takes a very long time, but then portmanager or portupgrade > > > > will continue on and the install or upgrade seems to work fine. > > > > > > > > Is this a known issue? > > > > > > Usually caused by setting an illegal option (usually USE_*) in the > > > environment, make.conf or command-line. > > > > I get it on "make clean" for editors/openoffice-1.1, but I haven't > > managed to track the problem down. With an empty environment and an > > empty make.conf. But that takes so long to build anyway that I don't > > really care very much... > > Let us know if/when you study it in more detail knowing the above > probable cause :-) I knew the "usual cause." That's why I tried it with an empty make.conf and a minimal environment, under various shells. And a simple "make conf" still goes into spasms of recursion.