From owner-freebsd-net  Tue Oct  3 10:53:57 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from urban.iinet.net.au (urban.iinet.net.au [203.59.24.231])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB0237B502
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Tue,  3 Oct 2000 10:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elischer.org (reggae-34-48.nv.iinet.net.au [203.59.167.48])
	by urban.iinet.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA22863;
	Wed, 4 Oct 2000 01:53:13 +0800
Message-ID: <39DA1CEE.ADCEA934@elischer.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 10:52:46 -0700
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, net@freebsd.org
Subject: ETH =?iso-8859-15?Q?Z=FCrich=2FComputer=20Science=2FJ=FCrg?= Bolliger
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Garrett Wollman wrote:
> 
> <<On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 09:07:34 -0700, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> said:
> 
> > In the past I had something to do with some systems that used
> > "vegas-like"
> 
> The bug in Vegas was that it broke congestion control.
> 
> -GAWollman

check out the first article on this page ..

http://www.cs.inf.ethz.ch/~bolliger/

for an interesting analysis....

Unfortunatly New-reno was not in the comparison,
but your suggestion that Vegas broke congestion control is not 
supported


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message