From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 7 22:53:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BBD1065674 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 22:53:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ladr.torres@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465838FC1D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 22:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyg7 with SMTP id 7so1038152eyg.13 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:53:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=TOSoTymb41EqdjQP+dlWvR8dEetKBK4SS4VywZZIRr0=; b=rVdzJodi+KTbjlgnHqYAZhr7RA02/N5Gy0qMJn+pOO9n2g8NKSxW4+ap2mepTB8441 Fzl09NA8e7F1UreaxR0dupkfHQSclUJa2idMkbJ8MQJma3lRrkBQ5InTZ9RHTj/ZYaE8 ypsbfl/4P/QJCuWE7b5i8JDm7ZvtlyPjGjMYM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=WXxCGbIYj2BHXU4H3KCAWhSK/FEuWmcWB1zVIGLLdSFQsxgJKr9bN0x6fFKLx1umFz 5uWtaEi1lv86LiNzWMCOCUTiApphIHIyJQJhIbNE9mxXxWVXQ76GeqPT1Xk6JOp8Gp0v omup1QV77xujtgXO5bMtdVU76X2bGT74s23b0= Received: by 10.213.108.144 with SMTP id f16mr679025ebp.136.1302216816122; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:53:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.14.205 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:53:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110405014825.GA3420@michelle.cdnetworks.com> From: Adriel Torres Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:53:06 -0500 Message-ID: To: pyunyh@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Revisit of older discussion on Intel em0 timeouts etc. X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:53:37 -0000 Hello, As promised, I have redeployed 8.2 Stable via Net-Install with a dc0 interface as a DNS Server. The machine has been serving requests for only about an hour and so far there are no link-state changes. I will keep monitoring and inform you of any changes. Regards On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Adriel Torres wrote: > > > > >> >>> Would you give me more information on dc(4) link state changes? >>> Can you see abnormal kernel message for dc(4)? >>> >> >>