From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 23:35:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC28C16A4CE; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:35:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6294343D5D; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:35:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B6PQR-0002AL-RW; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:37:15 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2P7a0xm095976; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:36:00 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2P7a0so095928; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:36:00 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:36:00 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20040325073600.GA93589@regency.nsu.ru> References: <200403232227.i2NMRQn5042762@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040324164155.GA4737@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040325051334.GB44484@regency.nsu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: David O'Brien cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.bin/doscmd AsyncIO.c AsyncIO.h Makefile Makefile.dos PROBLEMS ParseBuffer.c README README.booting_dos bios.c callback.c callback.h cmos.c com.h config.c cp437-8x14.pcf.gz.uu cp437-8x16.pcf.gz.uu ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 07:35:57 -0000 On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 08:28:23AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Alexey Dokuchaev writes: > > FWIW, I agree with David here.. I also had plans for improving doscmd > > some time in a near future. Right now, I feel a bit discouraged. > > Why? doscmd is now in the projects repo, which is no more or less > accessible than the src repo. There's nothing to stop you from > sending in patches. Hmm.. I somehow missed that it was moved to a projects repo, having an impression that it was _just moved_ over to ports. Thanks for clarification, Des. ./danfe