From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 29 09:59:13 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id JAA15076 for current-outgoing; Tue, 29 Aug 1995 09:59:13 -0700 Received: from kaiwan.kaiwan.com (kaiwan.kaiwan.com [198.178.203.2]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA15068 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 1995 09:59:12 -0700 Received: from exit.com (uucp@localhost) by kaiwan.kaiwan.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with UUCP id JAA12717; Tue, 29 Aug 1995 09:58:54 -0700 *** KAIWAN Internet Access *** Received: (from frank@localhost) by exit.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id JAA06323; Tue, 29 Aug 1995 09:30:50 -0700 From: Frank Mayhar Message-Id: <199508291630.JAA06323@exit.com> Subject: Re: CTM problems To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 1995 09:30:50 -0700 (PDT) Cc: current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Richard Wackerbarth" at Aug 29, 95 07:50:32 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME5a] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 777 Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > I have attempted to keep my copy of the -current tree up-to-date by > subscription to the CTM updates. > However, even though I am connected always connected to the net, I find > that I fail to receive many of the updates and have to go in manually to > "fill in the gaps". > Are others experiencing the same problem? If so, what is the cause and what > can we do to "fix" it. Yes; I see this with the ports distribution, as well. I don't know what the problem might be. > Is there any demand for a CTM distribution of -stable? If so, I would be > happy to work on setting it up. I would like very much to get -stable via CTM; right now I use sup to get that and CTM to get -current (I run -stable and keep -current around for reference). -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com