From owner-freebsd-smp Mon Jun 29 19:14:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA02756 for freebsd-smp-outgoing; Mon, 29 Jun 1998 19:14:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from indigo.ie (nsmart@ts01-03.waterford.indigo.ie [194.125.139.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA02666 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 1998 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rotel@indigo.ie) Received: (from nsmart@localhost) by indigo.ie (8.8.8/8.8.7) id DAA03914; Tue, 30 Jun 1998 03:10:00 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from rotel@indigo.ie) From: Niall Smart Message-Id: <199806300210.DAA03914@indigo.ie> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 03:10:00 +0000 In-Reply-To: Garance A Drosihn "Re: PPro vs PII" (Jun 29, 4:18pm) Reply-To: rotel@indigo.ie X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 beta(3) 11/17/96) To: Garance A Drosihn , freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPro vs PII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Jun 29, 4:18pm, Garance A Drosihn wrote: } Subject: Re: PPro vs PII > > It also doesn't address price/performance considerations. I went > with a dual PPro system simply because I stumbled upon a great > deal. On the other hand, I got that great deal because PPro's any left? -- Niall Smart. PGP: finger njs3@motmot.doc.ic.ac.uk FreeBSD: Turning PC's into Workstations: www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message