From nobody Thu Sep 23 09:42:46 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-cloud@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3518C17D8038 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:42:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pat@patmaddox.com) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HFVZc4cVvz3sMN for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:42:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pat@patmaddox.com) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A53B5C01E0; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 05:42:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 05:42:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=patmaddox.com; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh= pbWrvWvQzCKlYi4fJBHfVN3BgOo9cwNcAVAWQdRE8YA=; b=RM5TnWHMkyTpb9LA PdfEgvxLiX8CYrCfe7zgaVvFWp0Di4j+EnZStjygVxV++dP+iW/rB5sQ7FkMIgaY OjJzR2zMju2ALltHXdHlAIy68BjoZL2HnxQxk0+NrOukcGjvtQmB9P7P1Z2LKUxD sjHZPDKmRZK2vzJdqvCnG4STMuPHxKpJuzmWZZT4OnWzkpg1RYC4DmmX2Q3QpFIM sgRdZH2vjNfMq1d8/Zo1W51bCH/Ou1juBOwiq33A1Do12b2rcybwLxHIj1J8+rC3 3i8oRyJl4944bMatvMLAiHOrdn8ELFWrY/pTXzbYlkoUpSH/2z1TP2okS/4VwtNc qrz8tQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=pbWrvWvQzCKlYi4fJBHfVN3BgOo9cwNcAVAWQdRE8 YA=; b=SlFWMOkXeHNNSeaca7xMHBDS5amwzRIzAClCDMSFBs+uq2sWNSwHmXvnY cXNbw6xoJsq/E0sNWQb69tClSwcrkZcl6yBA80i2UatGTNMRxss7ijqCPYilkB8I PIHTWMk1OY6Fn7Zb2UmbnzsIAoGxdzqeuc5Hy5XKOLhdkmJCRZAvcRowi6axUANl 8Lpg5XEXe9IXrSkvL84z7sN9G1PpiOLy2olh2c0rCEQ+XSkPISS9wU0eidqeRekQ cBudXRDVgRyGSW3exTywY6oN0bVVWSveXPWCumVZ+QzlcRr5xeSx2Bz1j2NHaike +bIk+hkfXpPjU3Sc7VSuN4quzkbLQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudeiledgudekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffokfgjfhggtgfgsegrke hmreertdejnecuhfhrohhmpedfrfgrthcuofgrugguohigfdcuoehprghtsehprghtmhgr ugguohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeiveevgeejfeehgedvleeufeelff etfedthffhhfekveehleduiefgieekueeitdenucffohhmrghinhepfhhrvggvsghsugdr ohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hprghtsehprghtmhgrugguohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 05:42:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Pat Maddox" To: freebsd-cloud@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Current status of ZFS AMIs on EC2? Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:42:46 -0700 X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.2r5673) Message-ID: <60E1F943-9C3C-4265-B7EC-F49680B9262B@patmaddox.com> In-Reply-To: <65D39FF2-C14D-430E-A83B-0C3606E0D7AF@patmaddox.com> References: <65D39FF2-C14D-430E-A83B-0C3606E0D7AF@patmaddox.com> List-Id: FreeBSD on cloud platforms (EC2, GCE, Azure, etc.) List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-cloud List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-cloud@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_E0509714-84B9-4F4E-BF2B-1048A8CCCC17_=" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HFVZc4cVvz3sMN X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=patmaddox.com header.s=fm1 header.b=RM5TnWHM; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=SlFWMOkX; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pat@patmaddox.com designates 66.111.4.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pat@patmaddox.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.60 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.29:c]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[patmaddox.com:+,messagingengine.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.0.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.29:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[patmaddox.com:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[pat]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-cloud@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[patmaddox.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[66.111.4.29:from] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --=_MailMate_E0509714-84B9-4F4E-BF2B-1048A8CCCC17_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed; markup=markdown Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Also, is there a 13.0-release ZFS AMI? On 23 Sep 2021, at 1:49, Pat Maddox wrote: > Hi there, I came across Colin’s 2019 post announcing ZFS AMIs for > EC2 [1]. I haven’t seen any more recent information regarding ZFS on > EC2. I’ve launched one instance, and it appears to work fine from > initial tests (including recovering a known working boot env using > beadm). > > I have also installed the official 12 and 13 releases, and see that > they are UFS. > > I have two questions: > > 1. Is anyone using the ZFS AMIs for production? > 2. Why has ZFS not been incorporated into the official releases? > > Thanks, > Pat > > [1] > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-cloud/2019-February/000200.html --=_MailMate_E0509714-84B9-4F4E-BF2B-1048A8CCCC17_=--