From owner-freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 31 16:41:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E36F46 for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 16:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89068273A for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 16:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s4VGfKZ0087593; Sat, 31 May 2014 17:41:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <538A0630.5050608@qeng-ho.org> Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 17:41:20 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dependency graph? References: <20140531065218.GB169@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <538991E0.5000902@FreeBSD.org> <20140531122127.GA4538@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <5389D4D8.6060604@qeng-ho.org> <20140531140303.GA6286@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <5389F6D8.9010605@qeng-ho.org> <20140531162524.GA8098@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <20140531162524.GA8098@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 16:41:25 -0000 On 31/05/2014 17:25, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Arthur Chance wrote: >>> >>> If there are multiple repositories, whose dependencies will be shown? >>> What is the choice determined by? >>> >>> See below for an example, when I specify a repository and when I don't: > > [dd] > >>> >>> Why is "FreeBSD" chosen over "sibptus" when there is no "-r" ? >>> >> >> No idea, but I'd guess it's because the default repo gets priority. > > Which repo is the default one and why? Again, I'm not an expert but I'd guess it's either an ASCII sort, so FreeBSD comes before any lower case repo name, or whatever order the repo files appear in the directories. I don't have the bandwidth to read the code right now though. You could try renaming "sibptus" to "A" and see if it takes precedence. Repo names seem to be entirely arbitrary. >> I'm >> not part of the pkgng team, just someone who uses it. You need to ask >> that on the pkg mailing list and/or read the source code. > > Arthur, we ARE on the freebsd-pkg mailing list :-) > Missed the header. Busy day and not enough sleep. :-(