Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 17:41:20 +0100 From: Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org> To: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su>, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dependency graph? Message-ID: <538A0630.5050608@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: <20140531162524.GA8098@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20140531065218.GB169@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <538991E0.5000902@FreeBSD.org> <20140531122127.GA4538@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <5389D4D8.6060604@qeng-ho.org> <20140531140303.GA6286@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <5389F6D8.9010605@qeng-ho.org> <20140531162524.GA8098@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31/05/2014 17:25, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Arthur Chance wrote: >>> >>> If there are multiple repositories, whose dependencies will be shown? >>> What is the choice determined by? >>> >>> See below for an example, when I specify a repository and when I don't: > > [dd] > >>> >>> Why is "FreeBSD" chosen over "sibptus" when there is no "-r" ? >>> >> >> No idea, but I'd guess it's because the default repo gets priority. > > Which repo is the default one and why? Again, I'm not an expert but I'd guess it's either an ASCII sort, so FreeBSD comes before any lower case repo name, or whatever order the repo files appear in the directories. I don't have the bandwidth to read the code right now though. You could try renaming "sibptus" to "A" and see if it takes precedence. Repo names seem to be entirely arbitrary. >> I'm >> not part of the pkgng team, just someone who uses it. You need to ask >> that on the pkg mailing list and/or read the source code. > > Arthur, we ARE on the freebsd-pkg mailing list :-) > Missed the header. Busy day and not enough sleep. :-(
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?538A0630.5050608>