From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jan 10 22:38:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA23621 for current-outgoing; Sat, 10 Jan 1998 22:38:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from ache.relcom.ru (ache@ache.relcom.ru [193.125.20.108]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA23595; Sat, 10 Jan 1998 22:38:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@ache.relcom.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by ache.relcom.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA00814; Sun, 11 Jan 1998 02:21:38 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 02:21:36 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@ache.relcom.ru To: Joerg Wunsch cc: Peter Wemm , Mike Smith , FreeBSD-current , peter@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS DIFF fix for review (-L added) In-Reply-To: <19980110214329.11129@uriah.heep.sax.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 10 Jan 1998, J Wunsch wrote: > As Peter Wemm wrote: > > > This change is a dead end. The current version of cvs does not call diff, > > rcs, rcsdiff, patch or anything like that. This should be taken up with > > the cvs folks on info-cvs@gnu.ai.mit.edu. > > Well, but as long as the old CVS is in our tree, we should adopt > something like this patch to be compatible with our patch(1). I just send simplified version of this fix, CC'ed to info-cvs as Peter ask, under Subject: CVS patch to produce correct diffs (-L used now) -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/