From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 00:40:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319A2106566C for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 00:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF7E8FC12 for ; Mon, 19 May 2008 00:40:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zbeeble@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so944993ywe.13 for ; Sun, 18 May 2008 17:40:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=H6Ct74A3PLCKZhfWPnbUUjU7ucqaZX+D6asnI2JspSQ=; b=PitumOhEumx8xrRni8VjU7N2QH85v3t5MPyU9wjNgK+JIrfGWKxiF8iz7E4nPKc0s5NfGgXofiIvxBy55w9PRVBQfEEXDbGLDtSfRD1NTd6hNsvIIf6hD3CFQdnOvKu9npGf437aHQIkrKInNi2vxU7cKpZP+5HfSsKY4zxXUKE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=rg99mvQ3riCFZUpSNnNtEehcsEsYh0yqSgDX/lrBYfjkdx87QjYQQaKe8zaUM7Oj8U8j85uAm2dgqFoz4Y32+MQKJf4v+gDnrIBfaBUGt1r43nj/xmxgWLni1pkjP//BPU1IJDzM/ZZFxSz/GZlFDCLat2jSbgveKTzwbDs6krk= Received: by 10.150.12.3 with SMTP id 3mr5774981ybl.17.1211157620205; Sun, 18 May 2008 17:40:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.53.11 with HTTP; Sun, 18 May 2008 17:40:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5f67a8c40805181740v6f655fdjdfaec3312681b5c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 20:40:20 -0400 From: "Zaphod Beeblebrox" To: "Marc UBM Bocklet" In-Reply-To: <20080514223515.84553317.ubm@u-boot-man.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48291889.8030406@pldrouin.net> <20080514223515.84553317.ubm@u-boot-man.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of ZFS in -stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 00:40:21 -0000 On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Marc UBM Bocklet wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 2008 00:26:49 -0400 > Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote: > > > I would like to know if the memory allocation problem with zfs has > > been fixed in -stable? Is zfs considered to be more "stable" now? > > > > Thanks! > > Pierre-Luc Drouin > > We just set up a zfs based fileserver in our home. It's accessed via > samba and ftp, connected via an em 1gb card. > FreeBSD is installed on an 80GB ufs2 disk, the zpool consists of two > 750GB disks, set up as raidz (my mistake, mirror would probably have > been the better choice). > We've been using it for about 2 weeks now and there have been no > problems (transferred lots of big and small files off/on it, maxing out > disk speed). For standard filestore, Samba/NFS has worked fine. However, when using Norton Ghost to make backup snapshots, the files (on ZFS) come out corrupt.They are not corrupt on UFS backed SAMBA service.