From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 24 15:08:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880AA16A537; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:08:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.qubesoft.com (gate.qubesoft.com [217.169.36.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425D443D46; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:08:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from [192.168.1.254] (dhcp254.qubesoft.com [192.168.1.254]) by mail.qubesoft.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2OF89r8097206; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:08:18 GMT (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Doug Rabson Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:08:09 +0000 To: Daniel Eischen X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on mail.qubesoft.com cc: danfe@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: scottl@samsco.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: das@FreeBSD.org cc: Warner Losh cc: sobomax@portaone.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/msun/i387 fenv.c fenv.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:08:47 -0000 On 18 Mar 2005, at 19:00, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Warner Losh wrote: > >>> Yeah, well, that was your karmic punishment for touching the >>> internals >>> of FILE. Serves you right! >> >> I didn't touch the internals of FILE. I just helped clean up the >> mess. :-( > > That was me, but as I recall we ended up keeping binary compat > by reusing an existing field and extending it (green's idea I > believe). I think the real pain came when we tried to fix > the predefined stdio, stdin, and stderr descriptors to prevent > ABI breakage for future FILE changes. > > Has anyone experimented with symbol versioning yet? I recall > someone wanting to do that (dfr?). I did (and still do) want to do that. I'm also horribly short of free time/energy for the foreseeable future. I'm certain that playing with rtld would be lots more fun than writing a unicode string class and bidirectional text renderer (my latest work evil) but unfortunately I get don't get paid for rtld...