From owner-freebsd-python@freebsd.org Tue Jun 30 05:55:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42662990D9D for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 05:55:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EF5F1EFC for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 05:55:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t5U5tJ73010772 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 05:55:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201182] lang/python27 needs aarch64 handler Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 05:55:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 05:55:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201182 --- Comment #5 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Philip M. Gollucci from comment #4) My feelings when I asked Sean to create a review were: * I could only review the change syntactically, so opening it up to broader review was good for semantic review * Phab reviews are likely to get more visibility, thus progress quicker if it goes to python@ for review * (Documented) Code Review is a good habit to get into * Sean could commit it directly (encourages cross-repo fetilization) with approval, thus less gating/blocking then assigning it to an individual and waiting for them to commit it. TL:DR, Quicker outcome, less blocking. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.