From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep  9 11:24:55 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85B416A41F
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Sep 2005 11:24:55 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from roam@ringlet.net)
Received: from gandalf.online.bg (gandalf.online.bg [217.75.128.9])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C108343D45
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Sep 2005 11:24:53 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from roam@ringlet.net)
Received: (qmail 5497 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2005 11:24:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO straylight.ringlet.net) (85.95.80.104)
	by gandalf.online.bg with SMTP; 9 Sep 2005 11:24:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 19540 invoked by uid 1000); 9 Sep 2005 14:24:52 +0300
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:24:52 +0300
From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To: erkan kolemen <erkankolemen@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20050909112452.GB15059@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
Mail-Followup-To: erkan kolemen <erkankolemen@yahoo.com>,
	freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
References: <20050908194020.21635.qmail@web33415.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050908194020.21635.qmail@web33415.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: fok() execve() -> No child processes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:24:55 -0000


--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:40:20PM -0700, erkan kolemen wrote:
> Following code fails. I debugged it and saw that: it
> produces "No child processes" error while wait().
>=20
> is it possible, parent still is not start to wait but
> child finished. After that CPU schedules parents. It
> try to start wait but child has finished.
>=20
> is it possible... What can i do for that?
[snip]
>                 default:
>                         if (wait(&stat) =3D=3D -1) {
>                                 slog(1, LOG_ERR);
>                                 return -14;
>                         }

Just an idea: what happens if you try waitpid(pid, &stat, 0) instead
of wait(&stat)?

G'luck,
Peter

--=20
Peter Pentchev	roam@ringlet.net    roam@cnsys.bg    roam@FreeBSD.org
PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint	FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
I've heard that this sentence is a rumor.

--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDIXEE7Ri2jRYZRVMRAqrSAJ9cot5I5Jk7RXcgf4QFJGO411LnZQCeLVlT
xYxBHv/Z5+EDbXsRsJdEVUs=
=Vh1f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU--