From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mon Jan 1 16:18:24 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30551EB0CC1 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2018 16:18:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lm@mcvoy.com) Received: from mcvoy.com (mcvoy.com [192.169.23.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02B8E72140 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2018 16:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lm@mcvoy.com) Received: by mcvoy.com (Postfix, from userid 3546) id 86C9535E139; Mon, 1 Jan 2018 08:18:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 08:18:17 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Mark Millard , FreeBSD Hackers , "Rodney W. Grimes" Subject: Re: Is it considered to be ok to not check the return code of close(2) in base? Message-ID: <20180101161817.GF4678@mcvoy.com> References: <201801010305.w0135luG084158@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <559541DD-3287-4473-B7DE-B4DDC6860DF7@dsl-only.net> <69781.1514800992@critter.freebsd.dk> <510305A9-460C-407F-B2FC-3521A6E1D78B@dsl-only.net> <78982.1514823273@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <78982.1514823273@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2018 16:18:24 -0000 On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 04:14:33PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > But this is bikeshedding at this point anyway. +1