From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 19:03:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2575F16A404 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 19:03:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB29B13C46C for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 19:03:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from neutrino.centtech.com (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4FJ2x6J016031; Tue, 15 May 2007 14:02:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <464A03E3.4040805@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:02:59 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Kurakin References: <4649E0AD.4060705@inse.ru> In-Reply-To: <4649E0AD.4060705@inse.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/3247/Tue May 15 06:31:00 2007 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh1.centtech.com Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEDSUP: man -k cleanup (man -k RAID, some bits are missing) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 19:03:03 -0000 On 05/15/07 11:32, Roman Kurakin wrote: > Hi all, > > Trying to obtain information about supported RAID devices in > the system via `man -k RAID` I've found that not all known > by me devices are there. So a grep-ed a bit and going to commit > the following patchset. I think that keyword RAID should present > in description of all these man pages. But may be I am wrong? > > There is also some bits I was not able to fix. > 1) Is it safe to s/Array/RAID/ in ida(4)? I don't think that's good - an array isn't necessarily a RAID, and a s/r of that name yields bad results. > 2) Is it safe to mark ciss as driver for RAID controllers? > 3) Should be isp(4) marked as driver for RAID controllers? But isp isn't a RAID controller, it's an HBA. > 4) Should geom(4) be patched as suggested in my patch or > it is enough of mentioning in corresponding class utilities? > 5) Have I missed smth else? > > PS. I think that there is other such places where `man -k` is not > complete, so its good todo idea, currently not for me ;-). > PPS. Sorry for crossposting. I hope I included all affected parties. Eric