Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Jan 2014 09:09:45 -0600
From:      Bryan Venteicher <bryanv@freebsd.org>
To:        pyunyh@gmail.com
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r260224 - head/sys/netinet
Message-ID:  <CAGaYwLd9eYmTqKmVVnoyNMW52m7KXKHLke8fzVSPZPRbzQscNA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140106065314.GB1372@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
References:  <201401031103.s03B3CAf013123@svn.freebsd.org> <20140106065314.GB1372@michelle.cdnetworks.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:53 AM, Yonghyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 11:03:12AM +0000, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > Author: glebius
> > Date: Fri Jan  3 11:03:12 2014
> > New Revision: 260224
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/260224
> >
> > Log:
> >   Make failure of ifpromisc() a non-fatal error. This makes it possible
> to
> >   run carp(4) on vtnet(4).
> >
>
> vtnet(4) is the only device that doesn't correctly support
> promiscuous mode?  I don't know details of vtnet(4) but it seems
> it's not hard to mimic promiscuous mode.  I'm not sure why the
> driver returns ENOTSUP to user land given that vtnet(4) defaults
> to promiscuous mode for backwards compatibility.  It also does
> not handle multicast filter configuration when VTNET_FLAG_CTRL_RX
> flag is not set.  If vtnet(4) does not support multicast filter,
> it shouldn't announce IFF_MULTICAST. I wonder how vtnet(4) can work
> with carp(4) given that its multicast handling is ignored.
>

I've talked to Gleb off-list about this. I intent to remove the default to
promiscuous mode hack. Previous versions of the specification had a
footnote about this, but it has since been removed. Note that both promisc
and multicast likely require some host configuration on the
tap/bridge/physical interfaces as well.

I'll look at the multicast handling. If carp(4) already works with bhyve,
we might want to add a minimalist control virtqueue support to bhyve.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGaYwLd9eYmTqKmVVnoyNMW52m7KXKHLke8fzVSPZPRbzQscNA>