From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 14:28:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969F116A402 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 14:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D00213C469 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 14:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l39ESZQQ039769; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:28:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <461A4D93.3010200@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 09:28:35 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= References: <20070408140215.GA54201@harmless.hu> <86k5wmu420.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070408181916.GA59715@harmless.hu> <86bqhyu225.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86bqhyu225.fsf@dwp.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/3052/Mon Apr 9 07:23:53 2007 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh1.centtech.com Cc: Gergely CZUCZY , freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: volume management X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:28:43 -0000 On 04/08/07 13:57, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Gergely CZUCZY writes: >> yeap, i know about ZFS, as i assume, it will need around 1.5-2 years >> from now, when 7.0-RELEASE will be ready. > > No, it's expected this fall. > >> and i'm looking for a solution for a production environment within >> a year. > > There is no other solution. How about gconcat? You could create a mirror, then gconcat another mirror, etc, extending the GEOM. Then run growfs on that extended volume. Wouldn't that work? >> on-the-fly growfs is not required. stopping the service for a few >> minutes can be done, since we've got enough redundancy in our >> server farm. >> and UFS2 has growfs(8), that would be enough. > > I suspect growfs(8) may take more than a few minutes... > > DES