From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 06:01:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7261106566C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 06:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A768FC0C for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 06:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-124-250.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.124.250]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA9C1E427 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:01:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q3S61Dpn001996 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:01:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:01:13 +0200 From: Polytropon To: FreeBSD Message-Id: <20120428080113.bdfe54f4.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120428003613.GC22822@hemlock.hydra> References: <20120424175026.GD1303@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <201204241833.q3OIXwTR013401@mail.r-bonomi.com> <20120424190227.GA1773@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120425053133.e920b091.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120425064507.GA4673@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120425085555.36f91b3a.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120426215256.GA30059@hemlock.hydra> <20120427180051.4260a9f5@scorpio> <20120428003613.GC22822@hemlock.hydra> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: editor that understands CTRL/B, CTRL/I, CTRL/U X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 06:01:14 -0000 On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:36:13 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 06:00:51PM -0400, Jerry wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:33:29 -0700 David Brodbeck articulated: > > > > > >Again, this is one of the reasons credit scoring is becoming so > > >popular -- it's an almost automatic way to narrow down the pile. > > >Another method in common use right now is to throw out applications > > >from anyone who's currently unemployed, and only look at ones who > > >already have a position and are looking to change jobs. > > > > I have been told by several people in HR that the trend to give > > preference to those all ready working as opposed to the unemployed is > > based on the philosophy that if no one else will hire them, then why > > should we. While we could argue whether that logic is flawed, it is > > never-the-less presently in use. However, it doesn't really pertain to > > entry level openings. With the glut of individuals entering the job > > market, for an applicant to not be proficient in the skills being > > advertised for by the prospective employer is just a waste of time. If > > the employer is looking for skill "A" and "B", crying to him/her that > > you have skill "C" is just a waste of both your times. > > It *does* pertain to "entry level" positions, because (from what I have > seen) most "entry level" positions come with an experience requirement of > at least two years. But then this would invalidate "ENTRY level". How exactly is an applicant supposed to get a job from that "entry level" pool when he doesn't have previous experience because he simply wants to ENTER that field of profession? > You speak as though you think they're correctly identifying the skills > they actually need from their employees. A big part of this entire > discussion has been about the fact that many "responsible" parties in the > hiring process are utterly without capacity for correctly identifying the > skills they actually need to optimally fill the open positions. Correct, at least that's my experience. To give you _few_ examples which are more the norm than exceptions: "good MS standart knowledge" (Yavoll mein Hare Heiny Standart-Leader von Sowercrowd!) "programming knowledge in established programming languages, e. g. OS2" (cc hello.os2, and it's OS/2 with slash) "modern Microsoft operating systems (Windows 98 and XP)" (yes, _very_ modern and current; hey, it's more than 10 years old!) "extended basic knowledge" (so what, basic or extended?) "autonomous team-oriented working" (maybe as a one man team!) It's "funny" when you encounter job offers by recruiters and HR services who _fail_ to properly spell our native language, but think they are in a positition to place _you_ (as a professional) into a good job! Okay, it's NOT funny. It's also not funny if you have to explain to such a "senior consultant permanent placement" how to open a PDF file containing your application documents, and it's even worse when they try to trick you to do their work, e. g. enter all your data again into their (!) HR database. As I said, the problem of the unclear expression _what_ skills actually are needed can make it hard to properly apply for a job. This problem isn't only present for written application, it's also there if you get invited to an interview and the guy across the table is simply asking the wrong questions, or unable to understand your answers. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...