From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Nov  6 14:46:32 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA04138
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 14:46:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uucp.DK.net (uucp@uucp.DK.net [193.88.44.47])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA04119
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 14:46:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pingnet (uucp@localhost) by uucp.DK.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with UUCP id XAA02507; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 23:46:21 +0100
Received: from kyklopen by ic1.ic.dk with UUCP id AA11890
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j); Wed, 6 Nov 1996 23:42:46 +0100
Received: (from staff@localhost) by kyklopen.ping.dk (8.8.2/8.7.3) id XAA03922; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 23:41:55 +0100 (MET)
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 23:41:55 +0100 (MET)
From: Thomas Sparrevohn <staff@kyklopen.ping.dk>
X-Sender: staff@kyklopen
To: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>, Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>,
        hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Limiting bandwidth on a socket? (SO_RCVBUF?)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961106220041.27109A-100000@kyklopen>
Message-Id: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961106234034.3376A-100000@kyklopen>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Charset: ISO_8859-1
X-Char-Esc: 29
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 6 Nov 1996, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:

> 
> Not if we are talking ATM. It would actually be nice QoS and 
> traffic descriptors for a specific socket.
> 

Ups a bit to fast 8-) That should be it would be nice to be
able to specify QoS and Traffic Profiles for a specific 
socket. 

> Regards 
>    Thomas
>  
>