From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Dec 3 13:52:28 1995 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id NAA26650 for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 13:52:28 -0800 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA26644 ; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 13:52:21 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA19185; Sun, 3 Dec 1995 13:52:06 -0800 To: Thomas David Rivers cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.FreeBSD.org, jkh@freefall.FreeBSD.org, rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com Subject: Re: Hmm... not quite right in my previous diagnosis (SL/IP install) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 03 Dec 1995 15:24:01 EST." <199512032024.PAA19226@ponds.UUCP> Date: Sun, 03 Dec 1995 13:52:06 -0800 Message-ID: <19183.818027526@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > (line 101 of network.c) > > However, I see that the C code there is: > > msgConfirm("The %s device is not configured. You will need to do so\n in > the Networking configuration menu before proceeding."); > return FALSE; > > Which, you can see, is missing a value for the '%s' - so the string 'sl0' > was likely just picked up off of the stack. Are you looking at the 2.1-RELEASE code here? This is all changed, and in particular this line now reads: msgConfirm("The %s device is not configured. You will need to do so\n" "in the Networking configuration menu before proceeding.", ifname); I think you may very well be looking at the wrong code. Jordan