Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:09:12 +0100
From:      Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Cc:        usb@freebsd.org, mdf@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kern_yield vs ukbd_yield
Message-ID:  <201112122009.12557.hselasky@c2i.net>
In-Reply-To: <201112121405.38322.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <4EE51CB5.1060505@FreeBSD.org> <201112121658.22864.hselasky@c2i.net> <201112121405.38322.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 12 December 2011 20:05:38 John Baldwin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 
> >
> > > hselasky@ or someone else familiar with the various usb threads would
> > > have to answer that.
> >
> > 
> >
> > The problem is only during init() where the init thread has highest
> > priority  and that doesn't allow other threads to run even if the
> > scheduler is
> 
> running!
> 
> Hmm, that should be fixed by lowering the relevant thread's priority.
> Do you mean thread0 (the one doing all the SYSINIT's or thread we create
> for init (pid 1) before it executes init?

Yes, thread0. Correct!

--HPS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201112122009.12557.hselasky>