From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 30 21:01:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A066316A415 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pankov_p@mail.ru) Received: from mx5.mail.ru (mx5.mail.ru [194.67.23.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6782A43CCD for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:00:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pankov_p@mail.ru) Received: from [80.71.243.234] (port=62214 helo=[172.16.1.13]) by mx5.mail.ru with asmtp id 1Gpt1e-000BAr-00; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:00:58 +0300 Message-ID: <456F4684.3050104@mail.ru> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:00:52 +0300 From: Pankov Pavel User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: net-p2p/microdc: port is no longer in development, but there is a successor X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:01:00 -0000 The port net-p2p/microdc is no longer in development and it's author recommends to use more functional and supported fork called microdc2 instead (see http://www.nongnu.org/microdc/ and http://corsair626.no-ip.org/microdc/). I'm currently the maintainer of net-p2p/microdc and like to move to microdc2, but I don't know how to be with the port. I can see several posibilities: 1) net-p2p/microdc can be simply updated to microdc2's latest version (IMO it's bad: package/port name would be microdc instead of logical microdc2) 2) net-p2p/microdc can be repo-copied to something like net-p2p/microdc2, which later will be updated to microdc2's latest version 3) add new port net-p2p/microdc2 with the microdc2 fork (and net-p2p/microdc can be optionally marked as depriciated in favour of net-p2p/microdc2) As for me, I prefer the 3) variant, but I'm sure this isn't the first dead project and there is some examples that should be done in such cases.