From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 9 13:01:07 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA02181 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 13:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ime.net (ime.net [204.97.248.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA02176 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 13:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kimiko.tcguy.net (buxton-17.ime.net [206.231.148.146]) by ime.net (8.7.4/8.6.12) with SMTP id QAA25182; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 16:00:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <31E2BA86.4199@ime.net> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 1996 16:01:10 -0400 From: Gary Chrysler Reply-To: tcg@ime.net Organization: The Computer Guy X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b4Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Palmer CC: Michael Searle , questions@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports suggestion References: <28436.836937572@palmer.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Gary Palmer wrote: > > > and get a fair representation of what was added / updated in > /usr/local by doing the `make install'. I'm sorry, the only excuse for > not having full packing lists in ports is laziness, and if I'm in a > port doing an update for some other reason, then I'll try and correct > the packing list if the original author didn't submit one. > Amen! > > (I'm sorry if I just offended some people who submit packages to us, > but I know that both Satoshi and myself prefer full packing lists to > packing lists with a few directories in them) > That shouldn't offend anyone except the guilty ones! -Enjoy Gary ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Improve America's Knowledge... Share yours The Borg... Where minds meet (207) 929-3848