From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jul 17 20:50:11 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4D037B969
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 20:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from itojun@itojun.org)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W/smtpfeed 1.06) with ESMTP id MAA17782;
	Tue, 18 Jul 2000 12:50:04 +0900 (JST)
To: snap-users@kame.net
Cc: Lars Eggert <larse@ISI.EDU>, stable@freebsd.org, xbone@ISI.EDU,
	touch@ISI.EDU
In-reply-to: touch's message of Mon, 17 Jul 2000 20:01:22 MST.
      <3973C882.8FD3C1E0@isi.edu>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 2950) Re: KAME/FreeBSD-stable merge
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 12:50:04 +0900
Message-ID: <17780.963892204@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


>The 'hack' restores general functionality.

	the hack brings a buggy behavior back.  xbone relied upon
	the buggy behavior.

>The current KAME code does not support multiple tunnels between two
>hosts on a single interface. This restores that capability, which is
>required for setting up different overlay networks which use the same
>pairs of hosts.

	if you consider inbound packets, it does not make sense to have
	multiple tunnel interfaces for the same pair of outer addresses .

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message