From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 23 07:37:00 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C499106564A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:37:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au)
Received: from mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au
	[211.29.132.195])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7753A8FC17
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:36:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au)
Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org
	(c122-106-216-167.belrs3.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.216.167])
	by mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
	n5N7ambe023831
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:36:52 +1000
X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000
Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1])
	by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5N7alZI007540;
	Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:36:47 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from peter@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org)
Received: (from peter@localhost)
	by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n5N7alAm007539;
	Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:36:47 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:36:47 +1000
From: peterjeremy@optushome.com.au
To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Message-ID: <20090623073647.GA7501@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906211709420.1184@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20090622001705.GA10712@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0906221311210.28638@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906221311210.28638@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: is RTL8139 THAT bad?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:37:00 -0000


--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2009-Jun-22 13:12:08 +0200, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia=
=2Epl> wrote:
>i know all this, but i'm asking why processing single interrupt takes=20
>40000 CPU cycles.

All I can suggest is that you browse the sources and see what the
rl(4) interrupt handler does.  If you want to dig further, hwpmc(4)
may give you further insights.

--=20
Peter Jeremy

--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkpAhg8ACgkQ/opHv/APuIe8TgCghD67YxktOheKlSi/7T1mtqOF
b1oAoKfDapDu3h2Yicj7ZsMD4SPHnqe0
=XyVL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT--