Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:50:07 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Release Date Challenge, plus other stuff the project needs Message-ID: <201212140450.qBE4o7WS072403@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:20:34 %2B0200." <056b553a27eb0ef7c2d6ebb001ceb05c@foto.ro1.torservers.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Anonymous <anonymous@foto.ro1.torservers.net> > On topic... More off remit noise (**) Questions@ is for questions, Not an opinion dump. > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/schedule.html > http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.1TODO (** wiki & web could benefit from greater synch., But www & wiki & doc teams will have better understanding of issues, Anonymous@ should have raised that issue on their lists, not here.) > - Different dates listed for the same events. A point, But now's a bad time for this anonymous@ to again try to stir a premature `drains up' while the release is finalising. Release engineers & others will presumably later discuss release scheduling etc, after they've got the release out, & taken a well deserved rest; Till then best refute critics that could demotivate unpaid hard working release builders. > I've used FreeBSD fulltime since at at least 10 years If true, failed to learn http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo has different lists for different topics, in this case doc@ & www etc. & failed to learn best to send-pr a patch with eg SGML for www & wiki. This anonymous@ troll could be blocked. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201212140450.qBE4o7WS072403>