Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Mar 2007 19:24:59 -0800
From:      "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com>
To:        "Dave Baukus" <david.baukus@us.fujitsu.com>
Cc:        net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: netisr_direct
Message-ID:  <b1fa29170703091924u5f462394ydb77fb8868eb5f10@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <45F08F1D.5080708@us.fujitsu.com>
References:  <45C0CA5D.5090903@incunabulum.net> <45E6BEE0.2050307@FreeBSD.org> <45E6C22D.7060200@freebsd.org> <45E6D70C.10104@FreeBSD.org> <45EEB086.3050409@FreeBSD.org> <45F03269.7050705@FreeBSD.org> <45F08F1D.5080708@us.fujitsu.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/8/07, Dave Baukus <david.baukus@us.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> What's the word on netisr_direct ?
> Do people typically enable this feature ?

It really varies with workload. For a small number of streams I get
much better throughput with it enabled for a 10GigE link.


-Kip



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1fa29170703091924u5f462394ydb77fb8868eb5f10>