From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 19 12:00:30 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F6916A41F
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:00:30 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from current@dino.sk)
Received: from bsd.dino.sk (bsd.dino.sk [213.215.72.60])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD0643D4C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:00:29 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from current@dino.sk)
Received: from [172.16.39.201] ([213.215.72.45])
	by bsd.dino.sk with esmtp; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:00:53 +0100
	id 00005BFB.43CF7F75.000134DD
From: Milan Obuch <current@dino.sk>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:01:56 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <43CE30D3.8010706@dis.epm.br> <43CE94DF.4000000@elischer.org>
	<43CF78C5.90108@yahoo.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <43CF78C5.90108@yahoo.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200601191301.56509.current@dino.sk>
Subject: Re: Jails QOS.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:00:30 -0000

On Thursday 19 January 2006 12:32, Ricardo A. Reis wrote:
> Julian,
>
> > it seems from reading it that openVZ is closer to:
> > Marco Zec's "Vimage" project ( http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/vimage/ )
> > than to plain jails.
>
...
>
>    When a many numbers of the vimage caused performance degradation? I
> have a plan to introduce a many jails for VPS (Virtual Private Server)
> in University, but i have large DB with this is possible scale one or
> more vimage?
>

There are some number on Marko's page showing performance degradation 
somewhere around 1 %, if my memory is not accidentally overwritten :)

> > I would like to be able to work out how to make vimage "extensible"
> > and suitable for
> > inclusion in a production system because it is very cool.
>
>     Introduce this project in default system is very like, i like the
> work on this but i don't have more time for another's projects.
>

I would like really badly to get something like vimages too, however, I could 
only test patches if they are available. Otherwise I need to maintain old 
4.11 with vimages for some time...

Regards,
Milan