From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 7 12:51:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE88616A46E for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.freebsd-ports@ledisez.net) Received: from ledisez.net (ledisez.net [80.247.230.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772C113C4C3 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.freebsd-ports@ledisez.net) Received: from webmail.ledisez.net (localhost.localdomain [80.247.230.138]) by ledisez.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5985F45B488 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:51:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 62.212.122.219 (SquirrelMail authenticated user romain) by webmail.ledisez.net with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:51:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40696.62.212.122.219.1181220693.squirrel@webmail.ledisez.net> In-Reply-To: <58848.62.212.122.219.1180528038.squirrel@webmail.ledisez.net> References: <58848.62.212.122.219.1180528038.squirrel@webmail.ledisez.net> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:51:33 +0200 (CEST) From: "Romain LE DISEZ" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: Ports depending of devel/boost broken in -CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:51:34 -0000 Hi, what should I do about this ? Must I contact the maintainer directly ? Note my mistake : it's not net/boost but devel/boost. Le Mer 30 mai 2007 14:27, Romain LE DISEZ a écrit : > Hi all, > > because of a bug in boost 1.33, it's not possible to compile an > application depending of net/boost with GCC 4.2 which is the default now > in -CURRENT. The bug is described here : > http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/779 > > It seems (I haven't tested) it is fixed in boost 1.34. Are you planning to > update the port ? > > Thanks all for your great job.